A psychologically grounded test shows you in 4 minutes how you cognitively work with AI — and gives you an AI operating system tailored exactly to you and your profession.
4 minutes, no sign-up. One question per screen, keyboard or tap.
Your archetype, the axis profile, strengths, blind spots, and a role benchmark.
Prompt library, delegation map, and workflows — tailored to you.
The typology rests on a psychological model of four behavioral axes describing how knowledge workers use generative AI. The questions are mixed in polarity — sometimes agreement counts toward one pole, sometimes toward the other. That dampens acquiescence bias instead of rewarding it.
Four clearly defined behavioral axes instead of gut feeling. Sober language instead of hype.
Archetype, strengths, blind spots as a shareable profile — no sign-up at all.
Prompt library, delegation map, and workflows for your type and profession.
The one question no ChatGPT can answer for you: how do others in your profession work?
Every role uses AI differently. The test ends in an operating system that fits your day-to-day work.
Few roles stretch AI as far as consulting does — thinking partner for storyline sparring, machine for the slide deck — and it's the Verification axis that decides whose numbers survive the partner review. We're curious where you land.
In our model, product managers lean on AI mostly as a thinking partner — for prioritization, specs, and playing out trade-offs — while the Delegation axis splits surprisingly wide: do you break work into bite-sized pieces, or send whole discovery tasks off on their own?
In marketing, our model pulls the Focus axis firmly toward Maker — content, campaigns, variations by the dozen — but the more interesting question comes from the Verification axis: who really lets AI help write their tone and brand, and who keeps watch over it?
Nowhere does the Delegation axis open up as wide as in software engineering — from line-by-line autocomplete to an agent that clears whole tickets — and our model expects the most systematic Architect setups of any role here. What does yours look like?
Legal is the role where the Verification axis seems almost dictated by professional ethics — Verifier, across the board — and that's exactly why it's so revealing here to see where the other three axes make the difference. You're probably less typical than the cliché claims.
For research and teaching, our model expects the strongest Thinking partner reading of any role — AI as a sparring partner for arguments, study designs, and Reviewer 2 simulations — paired with uncompromising source-checking. Do you fit that picture, or break it?
Founders and solos stretch AI across the widest range of tasks of any role — from the pitch to the bookkeeping — and in our model lean hardest toward Autopilot, because where there's no team, AI becomes the team. The question is how much you really hand over to it.
No. Behind it sits a psychological model of four behavioral axes describing how knowledge workers work with generative AI. The questions are mixed in polarity — sometimes agreement counts toward one pole, sometimes toward the other — so a tendency to just say yes doesn't skew the result. Not optimized for clicks.
Honest answer: the model is built from theory — four defined behavioral axes, six mixed-polarity questions each — but not yet validated on a large sample. That's why the role benchmark is clearly labeled a model preview. Your report doesn't hinge on normative scores but on your own answer pattern: the prompts, delegation map, and workflows work regardless.
Because this is curated, tested, and tailored to your psychological type AND your profession — including a delegation map, anti-patterns, and a role benchmark. That saves you hours of piecing it together yourself.
No. The test runs entirely in your browser, with no sign-up and no selling of data. You get the report through a secure Stripe checkout — it unlocks in your browser right after payment.
For knowledge workers who already use AI every day: consultants, PMs, marketers, engineers, lawyers, educators, founders. At launch there are seven roles with tailored content.
For that, an optional update subscription (€29/year) with prompt packs refreshed every quarter is planned — it's not available to buy yet. The one-time report is yours forever either way.